A retired Assistant Director of the Department of State Services (DSS), Dennis Amachree, has said the appointment of Isa Pantami as Minister of Communications and Digital Economy revealed serious gaps in Nigeria’s security vetting process.

Amachree made the claim in his memoir, DSS @40: My Journey Behind the Shield, where he examined the controversy that followed Pantami’s appointment and the subsequent debate over his past public statements.

The former intelligence officer said the controversy, which intensified in 2021 after the resurfacing of old sermons and remarks attributed to Pantami involving extremist groups, raised questions about the effectiveness of Nigeria’s screening procedures for political appointees.

“In Pantami’s case, it is my belief that the DSS report likely contained references to his earlier extremist sympathies,” Amachree said.

He explained that the DSS conducts detailed background checks on nominees for sensitive government positions, including reviews of their public statements, affiliations, political associations, academic history and online activities.

However, he noted that the agency only provides security advice, while final appointment decisions remain with political authorities.

Amachree said political considerations, including party interests and regional representation, can sometimes override intelligence assessments.

He also questioned the circumstances surrounding Pantami’s confirmation by the Senate, recalling that lawmakers said they did not receive any adverse security report before approving the nomination.

The retired DSS officer said the episode exposed problems in the handling of intelligence reports and raised concerns about the influence of politics on national security decisions.

 “There are two plausible interpretations here: either the DSS report was sanitized before reaching the Senate, or it was submitted with adverse findings that were simply disregarded due to political considerations,” he said.

Amachree added that the controversy affected public confidence in Nigeria’s counterterrorism efforts, particularly because Pantami supervised a ministry responsible for key telecommunications and digital infrastructure.

He called for stronger respect for security assessments and greater independence for intelligence institutions to prevent similar situations in the future.